Open askming opened 2 years ago
once you've been doing it for a while, you'll realize that the best managers let their team make the decisions. Sure, they act as a tiebreaker every now and again, but their team should be driving things.
Associating management with higher compensation is a classic trap companies fall into. It changes all the incentives for individual contributors (ICs) who want to further their careers.
At its heart, management is an act of service.
So why become a manager?
The paradox of management is that the attitude that got you to that position isn’t the attitude that will make you successful at it.
management is tactical and leadership is strategic.
This chapter was inspired by (and some parts lifted with permission from) some of the lessons in a [talk by Keith Rabois.](https://delian.io/lessons-3)
To learn how to identify your priorities and then categorize your recent activities accordingly, see [Getting things done](https://themanagershandbook.com/managing-yourself/getting-things-done).
Each Sunday afternoon, write down your top 3 priorities for the week and design your calendar to spend 80%+ of your time on those priorities.
In order to maximize your team’s output, you need to spend time on the activities that will influence that output the most.
Use a color coding system when creating calendar events to group activities.
An energy audit is simply looking through your calendar and reflecting on which meetings give you energy, and which take energy from you. Then try to eliminate the latter category by hiring, delegating, and redistributing work.
All GTD systems all share two key insights.
How GTD works
The good news is that you can apply GTD to email fairly simply. The key is to asynchronously batch process your email. Turn off all push notifications and only look at your email twice a day.
Step 1: realizing you are feeling fear
Step 2: identify your fears
Step 3: leaning in
Negative visualization: Contemplate what you have, and then visualize your life without those things.
Enneagram [test](https://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test); read the description of on enneagraminstitute.com.
These type descriptions come from [The Enneagram Institute](https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/type-descriptions) are: The reformer, helper, achiever, individualist, investigator, loyalist, enthusiast, challenger, peacemaker
Byron Katie: [The Work](https://thework.com/)
This lack of rigor around hiring not only results in bad hires being made, but also in good people being passed over for unsubstantiated reasons. We call this voodoo hiring, a term from the book Who: [The A Method for Hiring](https://www.amazon.com/Who-Method-Hiring-Geoff-Smart-ebook/dp/B001EL6RWY/ref=sxts_sxwds-bia?keywords=who+hiring&pd_rd_i=B001EL6RWY&pd_rd_r=9a9d19e7-2e03-4c8e-bb16-0c25b6d2bc4a&pd_rd_w=0G1UU&pd_rd_wg=u6LgF&pf_rd_p=a5491838-6a74-484e-8787-eb44c8f3b7ff&pf_rd_r=GH5E0D9N8082WWK8XAAK&psc=1&qid=1572207863).
why hasn't hiring been standardized? For two reasons:
See [hovering art director](https://hoveringartdirectors.tumblr.com/)
an imperfect standardized system is better than no system at all, because the results will be consistent, and therefore can be evaluated against one another. It's important to be quantitative when hiring; it makes the system fairer and helps reduce bias.
there's an excellent book on this titled [Who: The A Method for Hiring](https://www.amazon.com/Who-Method-Hiring-Geoff-Smart-ebook/dp/B001EL6RWY/ref=sxts_sxwds-bia?keywords=who+hiring&pd_rd_i=B001EL6RWY&pd_rd_r=9a9d19e7-2e03-4c8e-bb16-0c25b6d2bc4a&pd_rd_w=0G1UU&pd_rd_wg=u6LgF&pf_rd_p=a5491838-6a74-484e-8787-eb44c8f3b7ff&pf_rd_r=GH5E0D9N8082WWK8XAAK&psc=1&qid=1572207863), that pioneered the concepts of voodoo hiring and standardized evaluation.
skip for now
skip for now
skip for now
skip for now
Zone of Genius framework from [The Big Leap](https://www.amazon.com/Big-Leap-Conquer-Hidden-Level/dp/0061735361) by Gay Hendricks
There are four zones: Zone of Incompetence, Zone of Competence, Zone of Excellence, and Zone of Genius.
People’s performance consists of a mixture of skills, strengths, and talents. Here’s how we define them:
"If you avoid conflict to keep peace, you start a war inside yourself." -Someone wise
The good news is there's a simple way of communicating feedback that avoids provoking anger and defensiveness. First, ask "is now is a good time for you for some feedback?", assuming yes proceed with:
"When you do specific action, I feel emotion because the story in my head is fear.
The research shows anywhere from 3 to 5 positives to every 1 negative is the optimal ratio to maintain healthy relationships and get people to act on your feedback.
When receiving feedback the key is to learn to evaluate ideas objectively and view feedback as a gift.
A system for giving effective feedback
The four quadrants of feedback are Ruinous Empathy (the most common mistake), Manipulative Insincerity, Obnoxious Aggression, and Radical Candor.
“Radical Candor” is what happens when you put “Care Personally” and “Challenge Directly” together.
“Look, I know we disagree on this but will you gamble with me on it? Disagree and commit?” By the time you’re at this point, no one can know the answer for sure, and you’ll probably get a quick yes.
📍: https://themanagershandbook.com/
Started on 2022-01-05