Closed brettz9 closed 10 years ago
I agree, should have a license. MIT?
(Due to a vacation this might not get resolved quickly.)
@sunfishcode , @dherman @andhow - any objections to MIT license?
I chatted with folks offline and we agreed on the Apache license 2.0. The license was checked in in 6d7f77a8163e1e85b14dba1656b8f85e3567de8c.
Thanks... However, since I'm only adding your code as a devDependency and then running through browserify rather than bundling, can you tell me what I should put in my file which does the requiring of asm.js as far as what Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
should show for asm.js when it gets copied into the distributed file? (The license template gets copied near the bottom of the JS file after browserify is done which I hope is ok)
Hi,
I don't see a license at the root of the repo. Could you put one there?
Thanks!