Open fa93hws opened 1 month ago
All tests were cache hits
203 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 40s.
All tests were cache hits
5 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 789ms.
All tests were cache hits
2 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 184ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 9s.
All tests were cache hits
3 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 920ms.
All tests were cache hits
3 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 924ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 27ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 27ms.
All tests were cache hits
2 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 296ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 112ms.
All tests were cache hits
3 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 254ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 236ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 81ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 81ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 504ms.
All tests were cache hits
40 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 2s.
All tests were cache hits
10 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 2s.
All tests were cache hits
10 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 2s.
All tests were cache hits
2 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 493ms.
All tests were cache hits
2 tests (100.0%) were fully cached saving 153ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 413ms.
All tests were cache hits
1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 171ms.
It's pretty meaningless to use remote-cache for npm
untar
action. All npm packages are small in size I think?And even if there's a big tarball, it probably take similar time to extract the tarball vs downloading these files from remote-cache? Even if the remote-cache is a local implemented one.