Closed NinoFloris closed 1 year ago
Crank is doing docker inspect -f "{{ .Size }}" [container]
, so in this case it's probably taking the whole container size into account, not just the added binaries. I assume we could use a custom argument to point to the folder containing the app. But the whole container size is also useful for use (c.f. container page in the same dashboard)
Well, my explanation is actually countering the numbers... some investigation needs to be done.
No uh... you're right, you see it's a classic case of scanning numbers and getting decimal separators mixed up...
The dashboard correctly states the entire container is a gig+, explainable given the build + sdk + restore was done in the same step. (see dockerfile https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/master/frameworks/Go/gin/gin.dockerfile)
Thanks for the crank source link, might come in handy another time 😅
Looking at scenarios under Native AOT here https://msit.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYTZjMTk3YjEtMzQ3Yi00NTI5LTg5ZDItNmUyMGRlOTkwMGRlIiwidCI6IjcyZjk4OGJmLTg2ZjEtNDFhZi05MWFiLTJkN2NkMDExZGI0NyIsImMiOjV9.
It's odd JsonGin reports the application size as being around ~1 MB (which is based on https://github.com/aspnet/Benchmarks/blob/main/scenarios/te.benchmarks.yml#L45).
Go is good but not that good...
Doing a docker build locally and doing a
docker run [image] ls -l --block-size=KB
produces the more expected result of-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14815kB Aug 22 14:27 hello
so about 15 MB instead.