Update documentation to mention `etcetera` crate instead of `dirs` for user configuration discovery

`ruff-ecosystem` results

Linter (stable)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+787 -36563 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 27 projects; 23 projects unchanged)

DisnakeDev/disnake (+4 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ disnake/ext/commands/params.py:807:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/ext/commands/test_params.py:143:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/ext/commands/test_params.py:146:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/ext/commands/test_params.py:214:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks

RasaHQ/rasa (+12 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ .github/tests/test_validate_gpus.py:26:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ rasa/shared/utils/io.py:66:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ rasa/shared/utils/io.py:68:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ rasa/shared/utils/io.py:93:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/cli/test_utils.py:458:13: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/cli/test_utils.py:513:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/conftest.py:891:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/core/test_actions.py:2811:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/shared/core/test_domain.py:1856:13: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ tests/shared/core/training_data/story_reader/test_yaml_story_reader.py:272:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
... 2 additional changes omitted for project

alteryx/featuretools (+3 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ featuretools/tests/entityset_tests/test_es.py:714:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ featuretools/tests/entityset_tests/test_serialization.py:130:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ featuretools/tests/entityset_tests/test_serialization.py:131:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks

PlasmaPy/PlasmaPy (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ tests/particles/test_exceptions.py:1040:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks

apache/airflow (+232 -25347 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --no-preview --select ALL

- airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:69:18: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- airflow/api/client/api_client.py:28:18: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- airflow/api/client/api_client.py:34:21: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- airflow/api/client/api_client.py:46:20: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- airflow/api/client/api_client.py:53:18: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- airflow/api/client/api_client.py:60:19: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
... 24623 additional changes omitted for rule ANN101
- airflow/callbacks/callback_requests.py:57:19: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
- airflow/callbacks/callback_requests.py:95:19: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
+ airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:309:14: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:309:31: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ airflow/cli/commands/info_command.py:199:18: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/info_command.py:199:35: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ airflow/cli/commands/internal_api_command.py:166:17: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/internal_api_command.py:166:34: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
... 297 additional changes omitted for rule S603
- airflow/cli/commands/standalone_command.py:51:20: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
+ airflow/configuration.py:1315:13: SIM103 Return the condition `not value is None` directly
+ airflow/dag_processing/manager.py:1268:9: SIM103 Return the condition `not self._num_run < self._max_runs` directly
- airflow/dag_processing/manager.py:498:9: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
- airflow/dag_processing/processor.py:422:21: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
- airflow/dag_processing/processor.py:803:21: ANN102 Missing type annotation for `cls` in classmethod
... 539 additional changes omitted for rule ANN102
+ airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:132:35: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
- airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:132:45: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:94:27: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
- airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:94:37: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ airflow/jobs/backfill_job_runner.py:923:13: FURB187 [*] Use of assignment of `reversed` on list `dagrun_infos`
+ airflow/models/abstractoperator.py:439:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ airflow/models/abstractoperator.py:441:14: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ airflow/models/abstractoperator.py:443:14: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ airflow/models/taskinstance.py:671:5: SIM103 Return the condition `not isinstance(value, (bytearray, bytes, str))` directly
+ airflow/operators/python.py:74:5: SIM103 Return the condition directly
+ airflow/providers/airbyte/triggers/airbyte.py:120:9: SIM103 Return the condition directly
+ airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py:649:13: SIM103 Return the negated condition directly
... 30 additional changes omitted for rule SIM103
+ airflow/providers/apache/beam/hooks/beam.py:575:25: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
- airflow/providers/apache/beam/hooks/beam.py:577:13: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
... 25545 additional changes omitted for project

bokeh/bokeh (+44 -4126 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --no-preview --select ALL

- examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:32:20: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:34:13: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:41:20: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- examples/output/apis/autoload_static.py:43:13: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
+ examples/output/apis/server_document/flask_server.py:45:17: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- examples/output/apis/server_document/flask_server.py:46:5: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- examples/server/api/tornado_embed.py:15:13: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
- examples/server/app/server_auth/auth.py:27:13: ANN101 Missing type annotation for `self` in method
... 4003 additional changes omitted for rule ANN101
+ examples/server/app/server_auth/auth.py:40:9: SIM103 Return the condition `bool(username == "bokeh" and password == "bokeh")` directly
+ release/system.py:43:18: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
... 4160 additional changes omitted for project

demisto/content (+166 -233 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ .github/github_workflow_scripts/utils_test.py:228:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ .github/github_workflow_scripts/utils_test.py:303:16: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
+ Packs/AHA/Integrations/AHA/AHA_test.py:89:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
- Packs/ANYRUN/Integrations/ANYRUN/ANYRUN.py:196:16: PLR1701 Merge `isinstance` calls: `isinstance(val, dict | list)`
+ Packs/ARIAPacketIntelligence/Integrations/ARIAPacketIntelligence/ARIAPacketIntelligence.py:763:9: SIM103 Return the negated condition directly
+ Packs/ARIAPacketIntelligence/Integrations/ARIAPacketIntelligence/ARIAPacketIntelligence.py:778:9: SIM103 Return the condition `self._valid(self.rcs)` directly
- Packs/AWS-GuardDuty/Integrations/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector.py:33:12: PLR1701 Merge `isinstance` calls: `isinstance(obj, date | datetime)`
- Packs/AWS-GuardDuty/Integrations/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector_test.py:355:12: E721 Do not compare types, use `isinstance()`
+ Packs/AWS-GuardDuty/Integrations/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector_test.py:355:12: E721 Use `is` and `is not` for type comparisons, or `isinstance()` for isinstance checks
- Packs/AWS-GuardDuty/Integrations/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector/AWSGuardDutyEventCollector_test.py:356:12: E721 Do not compare types, use `isinstance()`
... 342 additional changes omitted for rule E721
... 389 additional changes omitted for project

freedomofpress/securedrop (+10 -3 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

+ admin/bootstrap.py:120:9: SIM103 Return the condition directly
- admin/securedrop_admin/__init__.py:598:12: E721 Do not compare types, use `isinstance()`
- admin/securedrop_admin/__init__.py:600:12: E721 Do not compare types, use `isinstance()`
- admin/securedrop_admin/__init__.py:604:12: E721 Do not compare types, use `isinstance()`
+ devops/scripts/verify-mo.py:116:16: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
+ devops/scripts/verify-mo.py:120:26: RUF100 [*] Unused `noqa` directive (unused: `S602`)
+ journalist_gui/journalist_gui/SecureDropUpdater.py:23:5: SIM103 Return the condition `not pwd_flag == "NP"` directly
+ securedrop/models.py:261:9: SIM103 Return the condition directly
+ securedrop/pretty_bad_protocol/_parsers.py:1008:9: SIM103 Return the condition `bool(self.fingerprint)` directly
+ securedrop/pretty_bad_protocol/_parsers.py:1321:9: SIM103 Return the condition `not len(self.fingerprints) == 0` directly
... 3 additional changes omitted for project

... Truncated remaining completed project reports due to GitHub comment length restrictions

Changes by rule (22 rules affected)

| code | total | + violation | - violation | + fix | - fix | | ---- | ------- | --------- | -------- | ----- | ---- | | ANN101 | 35378 | 0 | 35378 | 0 | 0 | | ANN102 | 674 | 0 | 674 | 0 | 0 | | E721 | 558 | 312 | 246 | 0 | 0 | | S603 | 454 | 227 | 227 | 0 | 0 | | SIM103 | 157 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | S610 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | S602 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | | S604 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | | FURB167 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | FURB105 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | PLR1701 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | | S605 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | | PERF403 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | FURB129 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | D107 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | RUF100 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | E999 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | E402 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | FURB187 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | FURB136 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | FURB177 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | RUF024 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+252 -252 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 7 projects; 1 project error; 42 projects unchanged)

apache/airflow (+171 -174 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:309:14: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:309:31: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ airflow/cli/commands/info_command.py:199:18: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/info_command.py:199:35: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ airflow/cli/commands/internal_api_command.py:166:17: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- airflow/cli/commands/internal_api_command.py:166:34: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ airflow/cli/commands/internal_api_command.py:179:22: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
... 296 additional changes omitted for rule S603
+ airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:132:35: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
- airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:132:45: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:94:27: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
- airflow/example_dags/example_kubernetes_executor.py:94:37: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ airflow/providers/apache/beam/hooks/beam.py:575:25: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
- airflow/providers/apache/beam/hooks/beam.py:577:13: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
- airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/hooks/msgraph.py:327:12: PLR1701 [*] Merge `isinstance` calls: `isinstance(data, (BytesIO, bytes, str))`
- airflow/serialization/pydantic/dag.py:45:9: PLR1701 [*] Merge `isinstance` calls
- airflow/serialization/pydantic/taskinstance.py:70:8: PLR1701 [*] Merge `isinstance` calls: `isinstance(x, (BaseOperator, MappedOperator))`
+ dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:1082:13: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
- dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:1091:17: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
+ dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:1094:13: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
- dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:1103:17: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
+ dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:1106:13: S604 Function call with `shell=True` parameter identified, security issue
... 10 additional changes omitted for rule S604
+ hatch_build.py:660:13: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
- hatch_build.py:660:59: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
+ hatch_build.py:673:13: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
- hatch_build.py:673:59: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
+ scripts/ci/pre_commit/ruff_format.py:26:1: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
- scripts/ci/pre_commit/ruff_format.py:26:33: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
+ tests/dags/test_on_kill.py:44:13: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
- tests/dags/test_on_kill.py:44:23: S605 Starting a process with a shell: seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ tests/system/providers/amazon/aws/example_emr_eks.py:102:13: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
... 10 additional changes omitted for rule S602
- tests/task/task_runner/test_standard_task_runner.py:340:19: S605 Starting a process with a shell, possible injection detected
... 2 additional changes omitted for rule S605
... 314 additional changes omitted for project

bokeh/bokeh (+38 -38 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ examples/output/apis/server_document/flask_server.py:45:17: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- examples/output/apis/server_document/flask_server.py:46:5: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ release/system.py:43:18: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
- release/system.py:43:34: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
- scripts/hooks/install.py:5:20: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/hooks/install.py:5:5: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/hooks/protect_branches.py:10:22: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/hooks/protect_branches.py:10:26: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
... 69 additional changes omitted for rule S603
... 68 additional changes omitted for project

freedomofpress/securedrop (+2 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview

+ devops/scripts/verify-mo.py:116:16: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` identified, security issue
+ devops/scripts/verify-mo.py:120:26: RUF100 [*] Unused `noqa` directive (unused: `S602`)

rotki/rotki (+3 -3 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview

+ packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:144:11: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:144:28: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:166:26: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:166:9: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:174:52: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`
+ packaging/docker/entrypoint.py:174:9: S602 `subprocess` call with `shell=True` seems safe, but may be changed in the future; consider rewriting without `shell`

zulip/zulip (+37 -37 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ scripts/lib/check_rabbitmq_queue.py:143:26: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/lib/check_rabbitmq_queue.py:144:9: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/lib/check_rabbitmq_queue.py:160:23: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/lib/check_rabbitmq_queue.py:161:9: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/lib/hash_reqs.py:38:12: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/lib/hash_reqs.py:38:36: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/lib/puppet_cache.py:25:30: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/lib/puppet_cache.py:27:9: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
+ scripts/lib/setup_venv.py:173:31: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
- scripts/lib/setup_venv.py:173:55: S603 `subprocess` call: check for execution of untrusted input
... 64 additional changes omitted for project

agronholm/anyio (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview

+ tests/test_taskgroups.py:557:27: RUF100 [*] Unused `noqa` directive (unknown: `ASYNC101`)

python-trio/trio (+0 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview

demisto/content (error)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview

``` warning: The top-level linter settings are deprecated in favour of their counterparts in the `lint` section. Please update the following options in `pyproject.toml`: - 'ignore' -> 'lint.ignore' - 'select' -> 'lint.select' - 'unfixable' -> 'lint.unfixable' - 'per-file-ignores' -> 'lint.per-file-ignores' warning: `PGH001` has been remapped to `S307`. warning: `PGH002` has been remapped to `G010`. warning: `PLR1701` has been remapped to `SIM101`. ruff failed Cause: Selection of deprecated rule `E999` is not allowed when preview is enabled. ```

Changes by rule (6 rules affected)

| code | total | + violation | - violation | + fix | - fix | | ---- | ------- | --------- | -------- | ----- | ---- | | S603 | 454 | 227 | 227 | 0 | 0 | | S602 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | | S604 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | | S605 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | | PLR1701 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | RUF100 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Formatter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Formatter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check encountered format errors. (no format changes; 1 project error)

demisto/content (error)

ruff format --preview --exclude Packs/ThreatQ/Integrations/ThreatQ/ThreatQ.py

astral-sh / ruff