Open FishAlchemist opened 4 days ago
@charliermarsh Is the self-replace behavior worth dealing with this?
What’s your opinion?
I'm not sure. The whole "remove uv with uv" objective feels a little surprising to me. We can see if they fix this false positive before the next release?
Yeah, it's a little surprising. I think it's even worse that it fails (probably not that controversial), but it's probably not worth what we're seeing here. Maybe we tear it out and just give a better error than before?
@mitsuhiko -- Any opinion here?
winget-pkgs
PyPI
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9143
Scan by VirusTotal
uvx0.5.1-i686-pc-windows-msvc.exe
I think it's because of the use of
self-replace
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8914). This kind of self-updating behavior, if not digitally signed, can easily be mistaken for a virus.Microsoft actually provides a channel to upload files for analysis. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/filesubmission