Closed bsipocz closed 8 years ago
I still have two sphinx warnings locally, and don't really know what to do with them:
WARNING: FITSFixedWarning: LONPOLE2= 180.000000000 /lonpole
invalid alternate code, keyword resembles LONPOLEa but isn't. [astropy.wcs.wcs]
WARNING: FITSFixedWarning: LATPOLE2= 0.00000000000 /latpole
invalid alternate code, keyword resembles LATPOLEa but isn't. [astropy.wcs.wcs]
@bsipocz - I think we just need to fix the data in the data.astropy.org repo (however I'm not sure if those warnings ever caused sphinx to fail before?)
Weird, they don't fail travis :)
However numpy 1.6 does, as we build it with the stable astropy. We can use astropy 1.1 in that build if you want to keep it, or can remove it?
@bsipocz - thanks! One small request - since 1.1.1post isn't actually a package-template release, can you rephrase the commit message to just say 'to the latest developer version of package-template'? Alternatively, I think it would be best to actually tag 1.1.2 in the package-template. If I do that, can you update the commit message to then say 1.1.2? (I think it would make it easier in future if we tag the package-template whenever we want to apply the changes to packages, to make it easier to refer to versions)
Calling it simply the latest dev version is not very helpful I think, but tagging the template before mass applying sounds like a good plan. The configparser changes are critical enough to justify 1.1.2 anyway :)
@bsipocz - ok, I'll tag it later today (tags in the package-template are easy enough to do, unlike a core package release!). I just need to update the changelog first.
@bsipocz - I tagged v1.1.2, I'll announce it on the affiliated package maintainer mailing list later.
@bsipocz - thanks!
Includes configparser changes at both places for python 3.5.2