Closed astrogilda closed 2 months ago
It seems like this PR accidentally contains commits from multiple PR. Accidental push?
Can you kindly untangle this?
Just rebased against main, should be g2g!
Just rebased against main, should be g2g!
My recommendation is merging from main. I know there are differring schools here, I just feel the risk for unintended reverts (like the above?) is less if you do things quickly.
Some random ideas for roadmap:
sktime
forecaster in forecaster based bootstrapstsbootstrap
bootstraps to create a distribution or sampler-like object (skpro
or sktime
proba distribution over time series)pd.DataFrame
. "core" behaviour is np.ndarray
, but if pd.DataFrame
is passed, produces the output to have same index and columnsHmm this is after rebasing against main. Maybe let's focus on the readme.md file for now given the time constraints?
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 5:34 PM Franz Király @.***> wrote:
@.**** requested changes on this pull request.
still something weird going on with all files being changed.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/astrogilda/tsbootstrap/pull/126#pullrequestreview-2015841406, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTOOHQXUOI5QDLEAABPU63Y6V65BAVCNFSM6AAAAABF2ZTWXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDAMJVHA2DCNBQGY . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
it's linked in the updated readme.py
you can follow a hash if it is in a markdown doc in the repo? I thought that worked only in issues and PR?
Just tried, I guess you can't. I'll put it here.
you could just add an ordinary link, like [name](URL)
sure. let's please approve it after this.
Pull Request Template
Description
Updated
roadmap
inREADME.md
. closes #125 Expanded roadmap at #144Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist:
Add All Contributors Command
Remember to acknowledge your contributions, replace
contribution_type
with your contribution (code, doc, etc.):