Open sergiopasra opened 5 years ago
...rather autogen.sh
should be removed and replaced by calling autoreconf -i -f -s
...
I think there is no problem in keeping autogen.sh
in the source tree, but the results of running it should also be included, so a user can compile the code without installing autotools
.
the results of running it should also be included, so a user can compile the code without installing
autotools
.
No, this should not be included in the repository. Yes, this should be included in release tarballs.
The source code in Releases is just the compressed state of the git repository. If a user tries to install that, the full autotools stack is needed to regenerate the configure script with
autogen.sh
. I suggest that after the release is generated, a new file should be added to assets by runningautogen.sh && make distcheck