Closed utkarsharma2 closed 1 year ago
@sunank200 @phanikumv In addition to this thread - https://astronomer.slack.com/archives/C03868KGF2Q/p1682419076485949. I realized that we should only have an in-memory construct for Dataframe because if you consider transfers as mentioned below, they can be represented as existing transfers.
The only transfer that makes sense to me are:
Patch coverage: 86.05%
and project coverage change: +2.14%
:tada:
Comparison is base (
2ad5ab6
) 60.92% compared to head (d1a5213
) 63.07%. Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
What is the current behavior?
Currently, the dataframe dataset is not supported.
closes: https://github.com/astronomer/apache-airflow-provider-transfers/issues/18 https://github.com/astronomer/apache-airflow-provider-transfers/issues/21
What is the new behavior?
Added dataframe dataset.
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Nope
Checklist