Consider ingest of astro sdk docs

[mpgreg]

Please describe the feature you'd like to see Astro sdk is referenced in docs.astronomer.io (which we ingest) but not always accurate. Should ingest astro sdk specific docs.

Describe the solution you'd like Can probably use consolidated HTML ingest with https://astro-sdk-python.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

Are there any alternatives to this feature?

Additional context

Acceptance Criteria

• [ ] All checks and tests in the CI should pass
• [ ] Unit tests
• [ ] Integration tests (if the feature relates to a new database or external service)
• [ ] Example DAG
• [ ] Docstrings in reStructuredText for each of methods, classes, functions and module-level attributes (including Example DAG on how it should be used)
• [ ] Exception handling in case of errors
• [ ] Logging (are we exposing useful information to the user? e.g. source and destination)
• [ ] Improve the documentation (README, Sphinx, and any other relevant)
• [ ] How to use Guide for the feature (example)

Note:

• [ ] After the implementation is complete, the data should be ingested to the dev database and the dev slackbot should be deployed.
• [ ] This change should be tested by @vatsrahul1001 and after his take on quality of response, this should be merged

[sunank200]

Note:

• [ ] After the implementation is complete, the data should be ingested to the dev database and the dev slackbot should be deployed.
• [ ] This change should be tested by @vatsrahul1001 and after his take on quality of response, this should be merged

[phanikumv]

@pankajastro to link the PRs created for this