codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.25 :tada:
Comparison is base (
f14548f) 78.57% compared to head (6ec03a0) 78.82%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #20 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 78.57% 78.82% +0.25% ========================================== Files 5 5 Lines 420 425 +5 Branches 47 47 ========================================== + Hits 330 335 +5 Misses 73 73 Partials 17 17 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/astronomer/astro-provider-databricks/pull/20?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/astro\_databricks/operators/notebook.py](https://codecov.io/gh/astronomer/astro-provider-databricks/pull/20?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer#diff-c3JjL2FzdHJvX2RhdGFicmlja3Mvb3BlcmF0b3JzL25vdGVib29rLnB5) | `92.70% <100.00%> (+0.23%)` | :arrow_up: | | [src/astro\_databricks/operators/workflow.py](https://codecov.io/gh/astronomer/astro-provider-databricks/pull/20?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer#diff-c3JjL2FzdHJvX2RhdGFicmlja3Mvb3BlcmF0b3JzL3dvcmtmbG93LnB5) | `84.03% <100.00%> (+0.27%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Before this change, if the user were only using the command line, they could not easily identify the Databricks Workflow Job URL.