Please describe the feature you'd like to see
I would really like to be able to configure the output_table for the TransformOperator when using the @transform decorator.
Are there any alternatives to this feature?
:thinking: I'm not sure. I mean, I could just not use the decorator and initialize the Operator myself, but that's not as fun.
Additional context
Nope. I love the product though. I'm really excited to start using more Airflow =)
Acceptance Criteria
[ ] All checks and tests in the CI should pass
[ ] Unit tests (90% code coverage or more, once available)
[ ] Integration tests (if the feature relates to a new database or external service)
[ ] Example DAG
[ ] Docstrings in reStructuredText for each of methods, classes, functions and module-level attributes (including Example DAG on how it should be used)
[ ] Exception handling in case of errors
[ ] Logging (are we exposing useful information to the user? e.g. source and destination)
[ ] Improve the documentation (README, Sphinx, and any other relevant)
Please describe the feature you'd like to see I would really like to be able to configure the
output_table
for the TransformOperator when using the@transform
decorator.Describe the solution you'd like
Are there any alternatives to this feature? :thinking: I'm not sure. I mean, I could just not use the decorator and initialize the Operator myself, but that's not as fun.
Additional context Nope. I love the product though. I'm really excited to start using more Airflow =)
Acceptance Criteria