astronomer / astro-sdk

Astro SDK allows rapid and clean development of {Extract, Load, Transform} workflows using Python and SQL, powered by Apache Airflow.
https://astro-sdk-python.rtfd.io/
Apache License 2.0
329 stars 40 forks source link

Fix Generate-Constraints job #2093

Closed pankajastro closed 5 months ago

pankajastro commented 6 months ago

Recently, I upgraded the Airflow version in CI https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/2084 after that the Generate-Constraints job failed. This PR will restrict to generate of the constraints for the min and max versions of Python and Airflow version which OSS support

codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (aa0e57b) 90.23% compared to head (3884393) 90.19%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2093 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 90.23% 90.19% -0.05% ========================================== Files 75 75 Lines 4323 4323 Branches 538 538 ========================================== - Hits 3901 3899 -2 - Misses 324 325 +1 - Partials 98 99 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/2093/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [PythonSDK](https://app.codecov.io/gh/astronomer/astro-sdk/pull/2093/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer) | `90.19% <ø> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=astronomer#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

pankajastro commented 5 months ago

not require since we have updated job