Closed Lee-W closed 8 months ago
got some push back in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36416 and https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36523. already started the discussion with the community. started working on operator we've not yet contributed back instead of missing the check
Add draft https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36586
Different from its original RedshiftDataOperatorAsync
implementation, I follow how it's implemented on OSS airflow. The main difference is checking statement_id
vs query_ids
.
As of Jan 10th
As of Jan 11th
As of Jan 15th
As of Jan 16th
As of Jan 17th
As of Jan 19th
As of Jan 24th
After working on RedshiftSQLOperatorAsync
a bit, I think we should not deprecate it and keep it as it is just like the snowflake operator instead.
As of Jan 29th
Waiting for OSS provider release
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
as most of the functionality has been contributed back to OSS airflow, we're going to leverage the code there and deprecate this project
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Current Progress
EmrContainerSensorAsync
EmrStepSensorAsync
EmrJobFlowSensorAsync
RedshiftClusterSensorAsync
BatchSensorAsync
S3KeySensorAsync
use_regex
S3KeySizeSensorAsync
S3KeysUnchangedSensorAsync
S3PrefixSensorAsync
EmrContainerOperatorAsync
RedshiftDeleteClusterOperatorAsync
RedshiftResumeClusterOperatorAsync
RedshiftPauseClusterOperatorAsync
BatchOperatorAsync
RedshiftSQLOperatorAsync
SageMakerProcessingOperatorAsync
SageMakerTransformOperatorAsync
end_time
SageMakerTrainingOperatorAsync
(WIP)self.print_log
RedshiftDataOperatorAsync