Closed cdeil closed 7 years ago
Yes, these seem precision-related. The ring2nest one must be an integer precision issue, while the pix2ang
one must be related to #34. This are not critical since they happen for very high values of nside, but we should still try and fix them (fixing the first one might actually involve adjusting the test). What's curious is that the derandomize option is still resulting in different cases on different computers.
Anyway, a solution for now would be to lower the maximum value of nside until we sort out these kinds of issues.
What's interesting about these examples is that even if I set hypothesis to run them as known examples I don't see a failure. Very strange!
@cdeil - could you check whether you still get failures with the latest master? I think these should now be fixed.
All tests pass for me locally now. Closing this issue.
I see two test fails locally. I think they are deterministic (tried two times and got the exact same numbers / fails), and probably precision-related. @astrofrog - Thoughts?