Closed astrofrog closed 8 years ago
@astrofrog - doesn't that break everything? I think the repository name has to be <something>.github.com
to for with Github pages? (because otherwise the URL is astropy.github.io/astropy.org
or something like that)
I'm getting this from the first two steps of https://pages.github.com/, particularly:
If the first part of the repository doesn’t exactly match your username, it won’t work, so make sure to get it right.
which implies it has to be that name
@eteq - ah of course, sorry - wasn't thinking straight. Still worth changing to .io
instead of .com
?
I am Ok with changing to .io
.
I'm OK in principal with changing it to .io
, but I'm worried there might be side-effects? We'll have to update the DNS but that's fairly transient... but are there search engine problems or links to this repo in documentation floating around that we might forget to update?
(Maybe not - I'm genuinely asking, but it never occurred to me that this repo might change names so I may be guilty of embedding it in some hard-to-change place...)
I thought that github automatically does the redirect. I can type astropy.github.io
and astropy.github.com
and they both redirect to astropy.org
(as shown in the browser URL window). Likewise python4astronomers.github.com
redirects to .io
.
But maybe I'm missing some pesky details.
Ah, I didn't realize that - that fixes the DNS concern, but for the documentation I'm more concerned about the link to the repo: https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com. For example, there's a link on http://www.astropy.org/affiliated/ that points there which will break if we rename it. Obviously we can fix that one but I'm worried that there are others more deeply buried (forum posts, astropy-dev, etc).
But maybe we can make https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com redirect to https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.io ? If so, all my concerns are eliminated...
Normally GitHub auto-redirects when repositories are renamed. But to be honest I don't feel strongly about this, and we could just close this. I'm easy going :)
To be clear, I do think this is a good idea on balance, I'm just afraid it will break something...
At the end I would vote to just close this. Benefit vs. risk doesn't seem high enough.
We should either change the repo name to astropy.github.io or astropy.org - any objections? (I prefer the latter)