Closed adonath closed 2 years ago
@infinitron Test wise I ran the algorithm with high statistics on the data and I got a rather poor result:
I assume the result can be much improved by adapting the multiscale prior more towards extended emission. Would you have any recommendation for this? Getting a reasonable result here is secondary, but it doesn't hurt either. I think step by step we should add 2-3 other (possibly) challenging test cases and then we have a reasonable coverage of the current state of the algorithm to develop it further.
@adonath Interesting! Can you try switching the prior to this: kappa1=1, kappa2=5, kappa3=1
? I tried this prior on a different source and it appeared to capture some diffuse emission.
Thanks @infinitron! This didn't really help:
For this PR it's probably fine, but we should keep in mind to document a bit how to get reasonable results for this test case. I'll merge this PR now..
This PR adds a
disk_source_gauss_psf
test dataset. The disk has an extension comparable to the size of PSF and in addition I introduced a gradient to the exposure. This is what the data look like:The idea was to impose a little challenge to the algorithm, by (a) having a structure that has an extension comparable to the PSF and (b) a symmetry that is not adapted to the multiscale reduction scheme.