Closed rpoleski closed 4 years ago
Interesting, thanks, I did not realize this nuance before and I will look into it more.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable, other potential things to note and investigate:
also from that wiki entry, these two already exist as UAT concepts:
Yes, type II Cepheids are divided into 3 subclasses: BL Her, W Vir, and RV Tau. The period boundaries are 4-5 days and 20 days - see this website, which was prepared by Igor Soszyński. There are references to his original papers there and on wikipedia page. He investigated this classification in detail.
We actually have concepts for all three of the subclasses, but not one for the type II cepheids, which is interesting... I want to look into that further.
I think adding "Type II Cepheids" with 3 child concepts is a good idea. The fact that BL Her, W Vir, and RV Tau are connected is well visible in the first plot on the webpage I've linked (it's period-luminosity relation, which is fundamental in astronomy). If you go here you will see that Anomalous Cepheids are also a separate class.
accepted and implemented, will be in the next release.
Concept renamed to "Beta Cephei variable stars" (instead of cepheid). No longer a child of "Cepheid variable stars."
"Type II Cepheid variable stars" added, and BL Her, W Vir, and RV Tau moved under it.
Name the concept in question "Beta Cepheid variable stars" http://astrothesaurus.org/uat/148
Describe the change The concept should not be a child of "Cepheid variable stars." This is just a coincidence that prototypes of Delta Cep and Beta Cep stars are in the same constellation. See first paragraph of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_Cephei_variable
Please include any additional comments/feedback See also frequently-reproduced Fig. 1 from Eyer & Mowlavi 2008 (BCEP and CEP in green part).