Closed stlibrary8 closed 3 years ago
Is this concept focused on or limited to the Milky Way Galaxy?
Answering my own question it looks like this subject is almost always about the Milky Way. I did find at least one article that applied it more generally, but it was also looking at chemical abundances instead of stellar populations.
I've added this concept in these two places:
Stellar astronomy --> Galactic archaeology Galactic and extragalactic astronomy --> Galaxy physics --> Milky Way Galaxy physics --> Galactic archaeology
Like you said, it's hard to really determine the best placement. I think this will be fine for now, and we can move it later if this doesn't turn out to be the most intuitive location.
Galactic Archaeology (weird misnomer but definitely should be placed under Stellar astronomy and probably also Galaxies)
Brief definition: Study of galactic evolution through study of stellar populations. https://www.aao.gov.au/public/galactic-archaeology
Proposed hierarchies: Stellar astronomy --> Galactic archaeology Galactic and extragalactic astronomy --> Galaxy physics --> Galactic archaeology
Proposed related term (RT): Asteroseismology
2017A&A...601A..27L 2019A&A...623A..60S 2013MNRAS.436.1362Y
I am struggling with exact placement or placements in the UAT hierarchy but I agree this is a unique concept that does not seem to be captured yet in the vocabulary.
ST keyword enhnacements