Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Hello again :)
I understand your problems.
What will not work with the designs of our icons, is that the icons are all
white on
a color.
As Offroad is a sport, it will be under Sports category with a red color.
I can't imagine blue squares and green circles inside a red icon. Will be so
ugly :)
We only could trace the form (squared, circle, diamond), but no color.
Right now, I can't find a good way to indicate a "point". Maybe just an arrow
with a
dot. Hmm hard to explain, see the attached icon after this text.
Actually, I don't know any standard for this kind of icon.
Keep in touch, we will see how we can handle the "trail head".
Original comment by nico.mol...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2009 at 11:04
Attachments:
I saw a graphic on a tv show the other day which might work for "GPS Waypoint"
- it
was basically a circle with four short lines crossing at 0, 90, 180, 270 - sort
of
like a "cross hairs" - I don't know. The mark on the map is intended to mean
that
there is a location where there is a known and recorded GPS coordinate. The
waypoint name associated with the icon should be looked up in the legend to
find the
coordinate.
I sort of think it should relate somehow to sattelite/ a "G" or something -
that's
why I settled on a "lightening bolt" cause it sort of signified sky, or
"beaming
down" or something like that.
this isn't as easy as one woulde think.
bob
Original comment by grgrj...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 2:23
On the trail difficulty above. You need to pretty much stick with BOTH the
shape
and color. I know if you go skiing - they use the "black diamond" term to
mean a
very difficult trail.
How about a simple white pointer like you have but just put a black diamond,
green
circle or blue square in them.
All three colors would also show up well with a light yellow background.
Original comment by grgrj...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 2:28
After recieving your response to my email, I purused the remainder of your
projects
and see that you are thinking about a white set of icons. The black, blue and
green
icons I suggested do seem like they fit into "traffic or travel" signs. They
are
meant to mean a "trail with the described difficulty" - and could be used for
ski
runs, hiking trails, offroad routes, climbing routes etc. etc.
just a thought
Dj
Original comment by grgrj...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 3:02
Once you get involved in this you sort of can't stop thinking about it. I've
now
had another thought for "GPS waypoint" - possibly the letters GPS or even just
a "G"
inside a "V" shape - sort of like an arrow pointing down at the "point".
OR, even making the descender of the "P" into a downpointing arrow.
just another thought
bob
Original comment by grgrj...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 3:06
hello Bob,
Thanks for all your ideas.
For the GPS Waypoint, I like the "crosshair" symbol.
As I understand your needs in colored-shaped-trails on white background, I
don't know
yet if we can do something like this. IMHO, I would not do this.
I would like Matthias opinion too, please, on all of this.
Original comment by nico.mol...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 8:03
Please give me some idea what IMHO means!
Original comment by grgrj...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 1:20
IMHO = In my humble opinion
Original comment by myBCN...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 7:26
"In my humble opinion" like Matthias said :)
Original comment by nico.mol...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 7:41
Ok, now that I put it all together knowing the meanings. Let me see if I
understand.
The GPS icon - you like the idea of a 4-sected circle type cross hairs (?on a
white
background? or red?) [see below - could work for map/route/traffic as well as
it
does for sport]
The three trail difficulty symbols - you don't like? Is it just the color, the
shapes, the background or the whole idea altogether?
Google Earth (where I would like to use them) is usually a dark brownish/green
background (where the trails go) except for the clouds. So any light color
would
show up as a background. I mentioned white because: you said you thought the
"Red"
would look crappy.
As I understand you have officially accepted red as "sport" and I can
understand how
you wanted to put it in the "sport" category (i.e. skiing, atv, hiking, etc.
etc) -
However I did mention white because I thought that (if everyone thought red
looked
crappy) then white was an alternative because you seem to have designiated that
color for "routes" traffic etc. - which these COULD be considered as well.
Just the symbol (circle,square,diamond) alone - does NOT have any standard
meaning!
However, nearly everyone (at least in the US) who have ever been on a
designated
trail WILL recognize a sign with a "black diamond" on it as "hard, most
difficult,
not for beginners, trouble" etc. - even if there is absolutely no other wording
on
the sign! If you just saw a sign with a circle - you wouldn't have a clue what
it
meant (hole, flying saucer, period, etc.)
And IMHO, black on red does look great (designer colors); Blue on red also
looks ok
(depending upon the shades); Green on red - well hey those are christmas colors
(youse got a problem wi' dat?- as they say in New York). However - if you ask
me
black/blue/green look best on white which makes sense to me from your naming
schemes.
Anyway youse guys bin at dis much longer dan me! If you thought that it needed
more
explanation then a Green circle with the letter "E" inside, Blue Square with an
"M"
and a black diamond with "D" could make sense as well. [But that opens up
another
can of worms for language translation].
dj
Original comment by grg...@q.com
on 18 Sep 2009 at 1:44
Hello Bob
Sorry to answer so late.
We have been thinking in what we can do, and what we can't do in the project.
We want to respect the one and only rule : white shape and colored background.
So we cannot answer your requests of green circles, blue diamonds, etc.
But, we are still thinking in doing a "map coordinate icon".
These are the latest news.
--
Nico
Original comment by nico.mol...@gmail.com
on 15 Oct 2009 at 8:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
grg...@q.com
on 8 Sep 2009 at 11:40