Closed barthez closed 4 years ago
Merging #44 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #44 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.01% 86.01%
=======================================
Files 1 1
Lines 143 143
=======================================
Hits 123 123
Misses 20 20
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35986f7...cd0ee37. Read the comment docs.
I will have to test this later. I worry this will choke on e.g. <<<x,y>, z>, w>
type inputs and we need to be smarter.
I think this instead needs to be solved by removing <<
and >>
a lexed characters and then <<x>>
needs to be parsed separately instead.
Thank you for the proposed fix! :purple_heart:
I stole your test in #45. I wound up removing some of the parsing tokens instead of adding a new token to the lexer.
It was producing [<<, <] but it should [<, <<]. Added lexer rule with push back to fix it.
I was having troubles with dialyzer formatter to parse:
<<<_:8,_:_*1>>,'false'>