feat: add mqtt v5 specific bindings to mqtt

[pearmaster]

Description According to https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/issues/199#issuecomment-1567965696 , I'm only adding fields to the mqtt binding. This is because we don't want to create new sets of bindings for each version of each protocol.

Some general changes:

• Increased mqtt binding version to 0.2.0
• Added a column to the tables to indicate which MQTT versions the binding applied to.
• Create a new message binding

• Added a deprecation warning to the mqtt5 readme to indicate a consolidation of bindings under mqtt only.

  Here are specific fields being added:

• sessionExpiryInterval added to the server binding
• maximumPacketSize added to the server binding
• messageExpiryInterval added to the operation binding
• payloadFormatIndicator added to the message binding
• correlationData added to the message binding
• contentType added to the message binding
• responseTopic added to the message binding.

Related issue(s) Fixes #199 by adding new v5 properties to the mqtt binding Fixes #198 by adding maximum packet size

[fmvilas]

@dalelane @derberg @smoya @char0n would love to know your opinion.

[smoya]

LGTM! 🚀🌔

Do we want to merge this into master and then adapt it to work with AsyncAPI v3? That already happened in https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/pull/205, so we will need to update the binding in next-major-spec branch as well. As an alternative, we could do the changes based on next-major-spec and will be released with v3 of the spec, which I think makes sense unless there is a really urgency.

Opinions? cc @jonaslagoni @dalelane @char0n @derberg

[derberg]

we should merge to master, so it is changed for v2 too

[jonaslagoni]

ping ping @pearmaster 🙂

[smoya]

ping ping @pearmaster 🙂

I believe we can proceed with the merge of this PR. Nothing is expected from @pearmaster afaik. Anything else you expect @jonaslagoni ?

[jonaslagoni]

@smoya nothing but the JSON Schema files need to be moved to spec-json-schema repo 🙂

[derberg]

@smoya I just opened https://github.com/asyncapi/spec-json-schemas/pull/464 so I guess we can merge this one and the other PR?

[smoya]

/rtm