Closed conor-ward closed 1 year ago
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity :sleeping:
It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.
There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.
Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.
Thank you for your patience :heart:
@conor-ward implemented in 2.6.0 draft
Reason/Context
Please try answering few of those questions
Description
Please try answering few of those questions
I'm not sure if this is possible as the AsyncAPI version supported in this library is
2.0.0
so I'm not sure if updating this to allow2.1.0
or later would mean having to add more functionality than just adding SASL to the Security Schemes. So this Issue/Feature Request could be a lot bigger than just adding a Security Scheme.