Closed smoerijf closed 1 week ago
Allows for nicer architecture using interfaces in the projects consuming AsyncApi.
Service interfaces with annotations together with data classes can be separated from actual implementations. (Similar to WCF or gRPC)
No response
Allow the AsyncApi, Channel, ChannelParameter and Operation attributes to be used on interface targets.
(I've code & unitTests ready)
No
Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
Why do we need this improvement?
Allows for nicer architecture using interfaces in the projects consuming AsyncApi.
How will this change help?
Service interfaces with annotations together with data classes can be separated from actual implementations. (Similar to WCF or gRPC)
Screenshots
No response
How could it be implemented/designed?
Allow the AsyncApi, Channel, ChannelParameter and Operation attributes to be used on interface targets.
(I've code & unitTests ready)
🚧 Breaking changes
No
👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?
🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
Are you willing to work on this issue?
Yes I am willing to submit a PR!