3.0.0 initial tests

[Pakisan]

Why do we need this improvement?

To be sure that our definitions are working like expected

How will this change help?

see above

Screenshots

No response

How could it be implemented/designed?

• [x] APIKeyHTTPSecurityScheme.json
• [x] BearerHTTPSecurityScheme.json
• [x] HTTPSecurityScheme.json
• [x] NonBearerHTTPSecurityScheme.json
• [x] Reference.json
• [x] ReferenceObject.json
• [x] SaslGssapiSecurityScheme.json
• [x] SaslPlainSecurityScheme.json
• [x] SaslScramSecurityScheme.json
• [x] SaslSecurityScheme.json
• [x] SecurityScheme.json
• [x] X509.json
• [x] anySchema.json
• [x] apiKey.json
• [x] asymmetricEncryption.json
• [x] asyncapi.json
• [x] channel.json
• [x] channelBindingsObject.json
• [x] channelMessages.json
• [x] channels.json
• [x] components.json
• [x] contact.json
• [x] correlationId.json
• [x] externalDocs.json
• [x] info.json
• [x] infoExtensions.json
• [x] license.json
• [x] messageBindingsObject.json
• [x] messageExampleObject.json
• [x] messageObject.json
• [x] messageTrait.json
• [x] messages.json
• [x] multiFormatSchema.json
• [x] oauth2Flow.json
• [x] oauth2Flows.json
• [x] oauth2Scopes.json
• [x] openIdConnect.json
• [x] operation.json
• [x] operationBindingsObject.json
• [x] operationReply.json
• [x] operationReplyAddress.json
• [x] operationTrait.json
• [x] operations.json
• [x] parameter.json
• [x] parameters.json
• [x] schema.json
• [x] securityRequirements.json
• [x] server.json
• [x] serverBindingsObject.json
• [x] serverVariable.json
• [x] serverVariables.json
• [x] servers.json
• [x] specificationExtension.json
• [x] symmetricEncryption.json
• [x] tag.json
• [x] userPassword.json

🚧 Breaking changes

No

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

• [X] I checked and didn't find a similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

• [X] I have read the Contributing Guidelines

Are you willing to work on this issue?

Yes I am willing to submit a PR!