Closed nattrad closed 2 years ago
That depends on whether the meaning of the term "STARK" includes what is being described.
The end-result after applying the Fiat-Shamir transform is certainly a SNARK. But what is being described in this text is STARK$_2$. In this context, the end-result is also is a STARK$_3$.
Hello! Been studying STARKs, found this is in Part 1 of the Anatomy of a STARK, in the Cryptographic Compilation with FRI section.
Is the non-interactive proof system described here suppose to be a SNARK and not a STARK?