Closed oscarxblanco closed 1 week ago
Dear @swhite2401 ,
this is a modification of the matlab MomAperture_allRing
and momentum_aperture_at
functions in order to pass the closed orbit. Additionally, I put keyword options that were previously hard-coded, and verbose to two levels.
As this is a well known function I decided to keep it backwards compatible and by default it ignores the closed orbit.
If you agree to accept this change, who could review it ? Here is the matlab code that could be used for tests :
corbit = findorbit(THERING,positions);
tic
[dpN,dpP]=MomAperture_allRing(THERING,positions,Nturns, ...
'reforbit',corbit, ...
'verbose',2);
toc
@oscarxblanco , for matlab I would prefer that @lfarv or @simoneliuzzo reviews the code
@oscarxblanco ,
this looks very nice!
I do not use this function since a very long time, as I run the computations in the cluster only.
I do not see anything wrong at first sight in your code, it seems only better, documented and backward compatible.
Using the matlab argument parsing functions I think is also a very good choice.
should I test or you did already?
best regards Simone
Dear @simoneliuzzo , I tested it to compare results with another function we were writing at https://github.com/atcollab/at/pull/773 . Indeed, this is not a big change, I wanted to be able to pass the closed orbit and see the verbose. Apart from that, several parameters that were hard coded are now available to the user.
I would suggest you to use a lattice with some closed orbit and compare few or more points of the momentum aperture. The result might be slightly biased because of islands of instability that depend on the step, as you can see here below
@lfarv , yes, I tested it. I merge !
This is a Work In Progress pull request to update the arguments in the momentum aperture calculation on matlab. The idea is to have the possibility to pass the closed orbit, but, the default behaviour is preserved, i.e. ignoring the closed orbit. The reason not to change the behaviour is to avoid a change on the results from this commonly used function.
I mentioned this update in the discussion #753 . It might be already solved many times, but, it seems worth to provide a common solution.