Fig 2. and Fig 3. are too similar (saying the same thing)
Yeah agree. I like them, but potentially waste of a plot (might prefer incidence or prevalence).
FSW map and dotplot in Fig 2. and Fig 3. is not informative
If I wanted to change this, altering scales in facet of a ggplot is not possible directly and would require some kind of work around.
Talk about incidence and new infections (or prevalence) but no plot of this (or actually much discussion in the results)
This should probably be improved. Incidence and prevalence were an extension of the main work (so not emphasised as much), but are likely of substantial interest to an applied audience.
Yeah agree. I like them, but potentially waste of a plot (might prefer incidence or prevalence).
If I wanted to change this, altering scales in facet of a
ggplotis not possible directly and would require some kind of work around.This should probably be improved. Incidence and prevalence were an extension of the main work (so not emphasised as much), but are likely of substantial interest to an applied audience.