Hi,
I'm having an issue with the table areas. When I use the webserver to select an area to extract, I can get the table.
But it is not corresponding with an other area selection in pdf with an other software (adobe, pdfviewer or pdf2img).
So when I put the table_areas param with the true values (which I supposed are from adobe, and other 😄 ), camelot is extracting the wrong areas.
Is it possible to unify this ?
In addition, why making a list of string ["area1", "area2"] instead of list of list [[area1],[area2]].
It is memory lighter and don't need to split on string to extract x1,y1,x2,y2
Can you take a look ?
PS : I sent you a mail about a new method mixed of Lattice and Stream
Hi, I'm having an issue with the table areas. When I use the webserver to select an area to extract, I can get the table. But it is not corresponding with an other area selection in pdf with an other software (adobe, pdfviewer or pdf2img).
So when I put the table_areas param with the true values (which I supposed are from adobe, and other 😄 ), camelot is extracting the wrong areas. Is it possible to unify this ?
In addition, why making a list of string ["area1", "area2"] instead of list of list [[area1],[area2]]. It is memory lighter and don't need to split on string to extract x1,y1,x2,y2
Can you take a look ?
PS : I sent you a mail about a new method mixed of Lattice and Stream