Closed AnkeshThakur closed 2 weeks ago
Happy to send the PR for the fix if I'm not the only one facing this and community agrees to it.
@AnkeshThakur feel free to send PR. regarding that get_paged, it's mix of cloud and non-cloud method. as I see time to wrap up
I believe that paging workaround may have been due to https://github.com/atlassian-api/atlassian-python-api/issues/1310
So if you simply remove the parameter, it may go back to getting stuck in a loop for people with over 50 projects.
I wonder if the new parameter on _get_paged
didn't make it through the merge somehow and just needs to be applied there.
But then the parameter need to be handled in the _getPaged function.
I think it'd be the same as you see here: https://github.com/atlassian-api/atlassian-python-api/blob/33392bb506294297a571eb463a91ff644730908f/atlassian/bitbucket/cloud/base.py#L48
Jira._get_paged
but they forgot to add the new paging logic (as @jamesweakley pointed out) found in BitbucketBase
I was trying to use this library and while trying to get it work I find that this
paging_workaround
is wrong key here. Is it known issue?The cause of it wrong param being passed to Jira._get_paged().
Stacktrace:
Fix is very simple - just remove
paging_workaround
in this callAssociated PR: https://github.com/atlassian-api/atlassian-python-api/pull/1344/files#diff-160cdaa88ad7a2a6a2d2abd51b32052252fe4ec234c82030006888b10aca1bb0R2367