In some of our use cases we run some things in parallel, and then some serially later. To do this we have 2 different multirun targets we run back to back. In the parallel case when it's successful there is no output, which makes the output from the serial case a bit surprising. Would it be reasonable to have a option on multirun that silences the running [target] output when running serially?
In some of our use cases we run some things in parallel, and then some serially later. To do this we have 2 different multirun targets we run back to back. In the parallel case when it's successful there is no output, which makes the output from the serial case a bit surprising. Would it be reasonable to have a option on
multirun
that silences therunning [target]
output when running serially?