Closed mehcode closed 9 years ago
@mehcode By support.type
, do you mean the int
in your example?
If so, it seems that coloring got added through the .support.function
scope:
I could have sworn that language-python identified int
as .support.type
. It now works for python, which is awesome but that was just a case I was using to show an example. I would still like coloring for .support
or .support.type
. Atom Dark has a color specified for .support.type
.
I mean here apparently. I've been writing a syntax package and used .support.type
to indicate a built-in type and was confused when atom-dark
seemed to highlight it but one-dark
did not.
.support {
color: #FFFFB6;
}
I see.. ok, made a PR #41 for .support.type
with the same color as functions.
btw. this recent PR https://github.com/atom/language-python/pull/72 is probably the reason int
changed from .support.type
to .support.function
.
Thank you @simurai