As noted in PR #183, there was a difference between code coverage observed locally and on codecov. In fact, the reason for this was that two of the tests did not follow the correct naming convention for pytest to pick up on them (nothing to do with codecov). This fixes the issue.
As noted in PR #183, there was a difference between code coverage observed locally and on codecov. In fact, the reason for this was that two of the tests did not follow the correct naming convention for pytest to pick up on them (nothing to do with codecov). This fixes the issue.