Open dbolkensteyn opened 3 years ago
The IDs aren't used for deletion, that's just to link aria attributes. What problem are you having exactly?
The problem is quite subtle: When I slowly interact with the page, everything works., both tooltips show up at the same location and the one with higher zIndex wins.
However as I move faster between hoverable elements, eventually a few of them no longer get deleted and remain dangling, while most still work as expected:
If I then scroll the page with the dangling tooltip on it, it moves to the top left of the screen:
And here is its DOM element: (appendTo: document.body
, in case this changes something):
Ah I just realized that there is also a Javascript error appearing:
Also to note - changing the id dynamically will cause issues while doing snapshot tests. Whenever a test will rerun, it id
changes and isn't stable
So we should use a different technique for IDs than an autoincrementing integer for 1) snapshot tests and 2) scenarios in which 2+ tippy modules are embedded (for accessibility reasons, at the least)
Moving to https://github.com/ai/nanoid will likely be needed, though since this lib technically supports IE11 with polyfills, you'll need to add a new one if we migrate to this which is a breaking change
I am running two Chrome extensions which both embed tippy.js. When both extensions are enabled, they seem to conflict with one another, whereas they work well individually.
I believe that there is a conflict due to both of them adding
tippy-1
ID elements to the DOM, and both wanting to later delete them and so on.Is there a way to change the prefix (
tippy-
) of those IDs to make them unique between the Chrome extensions? Thank you!