search

atomix / atomix-vertx

Atomix Vert.x cluster manager.
Apache License 2.0
25 stars 5 forks source link

Works in vert.x 3.1.0, Vertx.clusteredVertx never returns in 3.2.0 #1

Closed cinterloper closed 8 years ago

cinterloper commented 8 years ago

You may already know this, but i have tested against V 3.1 and 3.2

3.1 appears to work

3.2 never returns : Vertx.clusteredVertx(options, ar -> { log.info("We got a .clusteredVertx result "+ar); //this never happens in 3.2 result.set(ar); latch.countDown(); });

cinterloper commented 8 years ago

no longer valid

kuujo commented 8 years ago

Oh thanks, I missed this somehow. We've been fixing some issues in Copycat and it seems to be having much better now.

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Grant Haywood notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #1 https://github.com/atomix/atomix-vertx/issues/1.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/atomix/atomix-vertx/issues/1#event-604802182

cinterloper commented 8 years ago

I really want to use this,

kuujo commented 8 years ago

Glad to hear that :-)

In general, Copycat (the Raft implementation) is feature complete and is believed to be stable. The full 1.0 release will be pushed some time this week. Atomix is thought to be slightly behind Copycat but is also thought to be stable. The final known issues in Copycat were fixed this weekend, and the result was consistently passing tests in this project.

The test suite comes from Vert.x itself, so passing tests lend themselves to the idea that the project is stable. But one would assume there are still some issues with running it in a production environment. For example, I see it's using getResourceAsStream to load properties files, and that should be changed. But aside from those types of minor details, no significant issues are known to remain.

I'll be releasing Copycat 1.0, another Atomix RC with updated Copycat dependencies, and this project at various points this week. That feels like a good checkpoint.

On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Grant Haywood notifications@github.com wrote:

I really want to use this,

is there an upcoming checkpoint i could wait for? a set of known issues that need fixing? sharp corners to watch out for? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub