Closed ImahnShekhzadeh closed 10 months ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
3f9d813
) 35.92% compared to head (399ec7b
) 35.92%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hello,
Thank you for your contribution. We have discussed with Alex and we think it is not the purpose of notebooks to have this kind of flags and several variants. The reason is that the notebooks have a pedagogical purpose. Instead of adding a flag, it would be better in our opinion to add the following sentence under line 10 of the current notebook:
# users can try target FM by changing the above line by
# FM = TargetConditionalFlowMatcher(sigma=sigma)
You are welcome to update your PR if you want to keep contributing. Once again, thank you for your contribution.
Thank you for the comment, I updated the PR.
Hi,
I think it is better if we explain what we want to do to users. Therefore, I would keep
# Users can try target FM by changing the above line by
# FM = TargetConditionalFlowMatcher(sigma=sigma)
Thanks
Sure!
Thanks, it looks good to me. I am now merging.
This PR includes a "flag"
USE_ICFM
inconditional_mnist.ipynb
(similar to what is done here intrain_cifar10.py
) to allow training both FM and ICFM.pytest
command?pre-commit run -a
command?