Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hi correa,
Coudl you please attach a sample with docx, java code and xmlparserv2.jar in
this issue which causes the problem.
Many thank's
Regards Angelo
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 2:47
Hi Angelo. Sure...
Im attaching an eclipse project ready to run. It comes with a docx sample that
is generated to D: drive.
Additionally i am attaching the xmlparserv2.jar.
The doc processing and generations works fine when java resolves the SAX parser
against a Xerces implementation, no matter if its packaged as
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.SAXParser or
org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser
Regards
Johannes
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 3:03
Attachments:
Many thank's to attach your file. I will see your problem as soon as I will
have time.
Coudl you please send us the stack trace with your SAX problem please.
Many thank's
Regards Angelo
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 3:23
Hi Angelo. There is no stack trace. What i mean is that XDocReports seems to
work fine in the environment mentioned above, the test runs without any
problem. The problem appears just when you go to open the generated document.
Regards
Johannes
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 3:33
[deleted comment]
I implemented a temporal hack forcing XdocReports to use Xerces library by
doing the following every time it uses a SAXParser:
XMLReader xmlReader =
XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader("org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser");
I see this hack could be risky according to javadocs, because this can lead to
security exceptions.
We should think the reported problem in a generic way: how does xdocreports
behave when the virtual machine has been forced to use a specific sax parser
different to Xerces?
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 4:33
Hi Correa,
I have fixed the problem on Git (will be available for 1.0.0).
The problem was the XML entries preprocessed by XDocReport was not well
generated. With Oracle SAX Parser, the namespace was twice:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<w:document
xmlns:wpc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2010/wordprocessingCanvas"
...
xmlns:wpc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/word/2010/wordprocessingCanvas"
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With Xerces Parser, namespaces are getted by
org.xml.sax.ContentHandler#startPrefixMapping( String prefix, String uri )
With Oracle Parser, namespaces are getted by
org.xml.sax.ContentHandler#startPrefixMapping( String prefix, String uri )but
those namespaces are present to the SAXattributes list.
To fix this issue, I test if prefix was not generated to generate attributes
list. See doStartElement method of
http://code.google.com/p/xdocreport/source/browse/document/fr.opensagres.xdocrep
ort.document/src/main/java/fr/opensagres/xdocreport/document/preprocessor/sax/Bu
fferedDocumentContentHandler.java
Tell me if this fix works for you.
Regards Angelo
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 4:48
Hi Angelo,
I downloaded the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT and run the test again. It seems to work fine
with both oracle and xerces parsers. What do you recommend us? Build the
libraries based on 0.9.8 tag with this specific code or work with 1.0.0
snapshot version?
Regards,
Johannes Correa
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 6:04
Hi Johannes,
Many thank's for your test. It's cool that this problem is fixed.
I suggest to work with 1.0.0 snapshot version because it improves a lot
docx->pdf converter. HTML text styling will be improved too.
For teh stability of XDocReport I think we have a lot of JUnits which avoid
having regressions. Those Junit are launched as soon as we commit on Git.
Regards Angelo
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 7:03
Hi Angelo. Should be feasible to replicate this fix to tag 0.9.8? We are facing
some troubles with the migration to JDK 1.6 because we are running under JDK
1.5 and there is a new dependency with a class java.util.ServiceLoader that is
new in JDK 1.6.
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2012 at 4:13
Hi Johannes,
You told me that :
> I am using version 0.9.8 of xdocreports, Java 1.6 (no matter, it happens too
with Java 1.7)
At first I would like avoid modifying our old tag because XDocRepport 0.9.8 are
deployed on central maven repository.
We have decided to migrate to Java 5 according our discussion "Can XDocReport
depend today on Java6 instead of Java5?" (see
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=fr&fromgroups=#!topic/xdocreport/4DNLRyrEemo
). You can post your comments about this topic if you wish.
I was afraid that some people (like you) uses Java5.
@Pascal : I'm not sure it's a good idea to migrate to Java6 just for using
java.util.ServiceLoader
I'm investigating to see how to manage Java5/Java6 ServiceLoader.
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2012 at 10:50
Hi Angelo,
My mistake. Our real environment is Java5 based, using XDocReport in a OC4J
application server. Given i am new into the company, my local environment was
quite different (Java6 as runtime).
Right now, my approach is a local compilation and build of XDocReports merging
the 0.9.8 tag with the fix you implemented. I know its not a desirable approach
but works to fix the existing restriction of our client to use in their
environment the Oracle SAX Parser.
About how to manage Java5/Java6 ServiceLoader, i did a brief research (googled
backport java.util.ServiceLoader) and found that some people did a backport. I
don't know if that would be an option to you... i still think is not desirable
unless it was a "official" backport.
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2012 at 1:23
Hi Johannes,
Have you read my previous message? Now the 1.0.0 manages JDK6+JDK5
ServiceLoader with reflection :
----------------------------------------------------------------
Finnaly I think we will switch to Java5.
I have commited the Java code to manage JDK6 and JDK5 service loader with this
class
http://code.google.com/p/xdocreport/source/browse/core/fr.opensagres.xdocreport.
core/src/main/java/fr/opensagres/xdocreport/core/internal/JDKServiceLoader.java
Could you please tell me if it's OK with you?
Pascal will change the maven pom.xml to switch to Java5.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Regards Angelo
Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2012 at 1:30
No, I had not read it... nice solution... im going to test it ASAP
Original comment by correa.j...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2012 at 2:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
correa.j...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2012 at 2:36