Open XavierChanth opened 2 years ago
An MVP was completed in PR 42, I will continue work on this in PR 43.
@gkc shall we lower the number of SPs for PR 44?
sgtm
@gkc @cconstab do we need at_daemon if we have API no ports?
@XavierChanth I don't follow ... how does "API no ports" address the problems which led to this feature request?
Browser support; preventing local secondary cache duplication.
@XavierChanth I don't follow ... how does "API no ports" address the problems which led to this feature request?
Browser support; preventing local secondary cache duplication.
Right, fundamentally different goals.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Browser support; preventing local secondary cache duplication.
Describe the solution you'd like A desktop application or daemon that exposes the atProtocol locally through one or more of the following:
Features:
Describe alternatives you've considered See #606
Additional context See #606