Closed ghost closed 6 years ago
I presume this is for spec parsing, and I'm not sure you can do much about that:
@willhite @arv mentioned something in slack about this a while back too
We could add some api that allowed clients to add protocols dynamically and we could use that for our IPFS chat application. The nice thing is that noms and all of other utils/samples would be unencumbered by IPFS libraries, the downside is that they wouldn't work with IPFS-based databases. :-(
I think it is fine to make it pluggable. Just somebody needs to design the contract with spec package.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Dan Willhite notifications@github.com wrote:
We could add some api that allowed clients to add protocols dynamically and we could use that for our IPFS chat application. The nice thing is that noms and all of other utils/samples would be unencumbered by IPFS libraries, the downside is that they wouldn't work with IPFS-based databases. :-(
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3709#issuecomment-331339233, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BIt08orsaDjmJfBbgaVqLnXce8Prks5skyYrgaJpZM4PY6cR .
e.g. nearly tripped the size of the
csv-export
binary