search

attic-labs / noms

The versioned, forkable, syncable database
Apache License 2.0
7.45k stars 267 forks source link

noms-chat demos #3808

Open ghost opened 6 years ago

ghost commented 6 years ago

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

The sample have had no commits for a while so i am guessing they are stale... Wondering which is the best sample to use to try things out with.

aboodman commented 6 years ago

I took it out, here:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0f24d13f525

... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that.

What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi .

ghost commented 6 years ago

My interest.

I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park.

Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw !

So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, notifications@github.com wrote:

I took it out, here:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0f24d13f525

... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that.

What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi

.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395418648, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi .

ghost commented 6 years ago

Btw samples could be in a different repo and vendor all their dependencies. Will make it easier to hack on noms are not care about breaking samples

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 16:42 Ged Wed, gedw99@gmail.com wrote:

My interest.

I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park.

Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw !

So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, notifications@github.com wrote:

I took it out, here:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0f24d13f525

... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that.

What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi

.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395418648, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi .

aboodman commented 6 years ago

Cool. You can just check out the code from before my change right now. I'll figure out whether to undo this change to remove the IPFS store or fix the demo soon.

Thanks!

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:43 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

My interest.

I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park.

Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw !

So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, notifications@github.com wrote:

I took it out, here:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0 f24d13f525

... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that.

What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi

.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395418648, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi .

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395446453, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BFP5N5J7YOA-kbo0mNy62EU1stDLks5t6TwFgaJpZM4UeYZi .

aboodman commented 6 years ago

Yeah agree. I think someone else who was looking at this recently ran into a problem that direction...

I think it was just how to make all the CLI tools know about the other chunkstore type. Like if IPFS store is in another repo that is fine for applications that directly link noms. But what about noms show and friends?

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:44 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

Btw samples could be in a different repo and vendor all their dependencies. Will make it easier to hack on noms are not care about breaking samples

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 16:42 Ged Wed, gedw99@gmail.com wrote:

My interest.

I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park.

Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw !

So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, notifications@github.com wrote:

I took it out, here:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/ 24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0f24d13f525

... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that.

What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 notifications@github.com wrote:

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi

.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395418648 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi .

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3808#issuecomment-395446987, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BC0RMTPPlnKMLi3ZD5RanWWSoSCMks5t6TxTgaJpZM4UeYZi .

aboodman commented 5 years ago

I tried to revert https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/24dc7ad17000f04cf08179dc2973b0f24d13f525 but I can't seem to remember how to get gx to pull all the deps, so I still can't build :-/.