Closed lak closed 5 years ago
Here's the stacktrace:
Error Trace: try.go:99
try.go:51
noms_set.go:106
noms_struct.go:112
noms_struct.go:52
noms_struct.go:38
noms.go:100
proc.go:201
asm_amd64.s:1333
Error: Expected true
goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/attic-labs/noms/go/d.PanicIfTrue(0xc000200a01)
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/go/d/try.go:51 +0xaa
main.argumentToValue(0x7ffeefbffa1a, 0x0, 0x1b25c40, 0xc000200ba0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/cmd/noms/noms_set.go:106 +0x46
main.applyStructEdits(0x183e6f0, 0x3, 0x7ffeefbffa04, 0xb, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/cmd/noms/noms_struct.go:112 +0x1d4
main.nomsStructNew(0x7ffeefbffa04, 0xb, 0x7ffeefbff9ff, 0x4, 0xc000200a40, 0x2, 0x2, 0x6)
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/cmd/noms/noms_struct.go:52 +0x203
main.nomsStruct.func1(0xc00009fa80, 0xa, 0xc00009fa80)
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/cmd/noms/noms_struct.go:38 +0x296
main.main()
/Users/luke/src/github.com/attic-labs/noms/cmd/noms/noms.go:100 +0xd78
Note that I could see this not being considered a bug, but at least in that case the error message should be improved. IMO, though, empty strings should be allowed.
eep, yeah, looks like I for some reason thought it was impossible to end up with an empty string here. That's silly.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:34 PM Luke Kanies notifications@github.com wrote:
Note that I could see this not being considered a bug, but at least in that case the error message should be improved. IMO, though, empty strings should be allowed.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/issues/3831#issuecomment-459927641, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BJWA3moolhg-yn3tnTpiYeW4Ximaks5vJPlKgaJpZM4afX0O .
Hard to discover when dealing with large datasets, but easy to reproduce: