Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'll take a look at it.
Original comment by gfor...@gmail.com
on 29 Dec 2010 at 8:53
Original comment by cfastdev@gmail.com
on 11 Oct 2011 at 1:54
Check r257 and see if it addresses this issue correctly.
Original comment by rpea...@gmail.com
on 1 Nov 2011 at 3:55
What is the status of this issue?
Original comment by mcgra...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2013 at 1:35
Glenn,
Check line 82 of target.f90 and see if the exposure flux (currently the sum of
the front and rear fluxes is what you'd like for this calculation.
Original comment by cfastdev@gmail.com
on 22 Jul 2013 at 2:27
think this looks ok
Original comment by gfor...@gmail.com
on 24 Jul 2013 at 11:41
This seems to work and had been included in validation studies so we'll close
this one for now.
Original comment by cfastdev@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2014 at 4:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cfastdev@gmail.com
on 29 Dec 2010 at 8:43