Closed hagenw closed 4 months ago
Seems our tests were already well prepared for this step, as I didn't had to change anything.
So my understanding is that one could get away without defaulting to parquet in Table - still it is better at the level of API consistency.
Exactly, we don't have to change it in audformat.Table.save()
, but I also thought that it would be more consistent this way.
As we now support storing tables as parquet files in
audb>=1.8.0
, and have published the first databases, I would propose to switch to parquet for storing tables in the nextaudformat
release.This pull request changes the default values of the
storage_format
argument inaudformat.Database.save()
andaudformat.Table.save()
to"parquet"
.