Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 6:48
Applied the patch and it works better then advertised :)
We need to compare the g/s between release 0022 and 0023 when it's ready for a
release in order to get the cumulative performance gain from all the patches in
the changelog.
Fixed in r138
Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 6:58
Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2010 at 10:06
I did some speed tests to look at how much this patch improved performance.
Using the two different kinds of tests that netprobe used in issue 158 (one
with and one without waypoints), I calculated the average games played per
second with two different versions of the application (before and after the
patch). The two tests are described below.
Before running each test, I deleted the "etc" directory and restarted Evolution
Chamber to avoid caching or memory issues that might effect performance. Each
test used 1 processor and ran for 20 seconds. The average games played per
second was calculated using code that I added to the application. I didn't
check the resulting build order for accuracy...I only focused on the speed.
Test 1:
Final: 7 Mutas, +1 Flyer Attack
Test 2:
WP0: 6 Zerglings
WP1: 6 Roaches
WP2: 2 Hydralisks
WP3: 3 Overseers
Final: 7 Mutalisks, +1 Flyer Attack
==========
Before patch (r137):
Test 1: 2263.6097935814796
Test 2: 2751.724211543719
After patch:
Test 1: 2498.2067605795696 (~9% increase)
Test 2: 3724.5669481423683 (~36% increase)
Original comment by mike.angstadt
on 29 Nov 2010 at 11:24
nafets.st, there appears to be a problem with the patch:
http://code.google.com/p/evolutionchamber/source/detail?r=138
Original comment by mike.angstadt
on 29 Nov 2010 at 11:49
Thank you for noticing this error, I'm looking into it currently.
Original comment by nafets...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2010 at 1:10
[deleted comment]
Accidentally deleted post.
Original comment by nafets...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2010 at 5:02
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nafets...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 4:39Attachments: