search

audriusrudalevicius / evolutionchamber

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/evolutionchamber
0 stars 0 forks source link

Mineral field saturation per base isn't taken into account #60

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Put final deadline 200 drones, deadline 120:0
2. start

What is the expected output?

What do you see instead?
Failed to meet waypoint. BuildQueen
At time: 120:00
Minerals: 724127

thats average mineral rate of 6034/ minute which means running 7.4 bases on 
full saturation for 120 minutes.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0015 Windows vista 32bit

Please provide any additional information below.
Would get more accurate timings for builds if this was taken into account, 
still, pretty low priority.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Jussi.Pa...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2010 at 12:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
When I do that it gets me 9 hatcheries and 180 drones by 14 minutes, so around 
700k minerals seems realistic. (Mineral Patches don't mine out right now)

Original comment by azzur...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2010 at 1:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
In one base total minerals are 8x 1500 = 12000, which means for 700k minerals 
you would have to exhaust 58 bases.

Original comment by Jussi.Pa...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2010 at 6:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Taking into account only normal mineral bases.
It would be more than that since rich minerals/high yields only have 6 x 1500 = 
9000 minerals.
(this assumes high yield fields are taken into account)

Original comment by jason.jo...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2010 at 3:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Mineral field saturation is taken into account in 0017+, and I don't see why 
minerals mined matters for a build order optimizer. Maybe for an AI that plays 
the whole game for you, but...

Original comment by AudioL...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2010 at 4:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Minerals mined matters since if the optimizer gets more minerals than its 
really possible, it gets results impossible to undertake. But if saturation is 
taken into account then the "defect" i reported is fixed.

Original comment by Jussi.Pa...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2010 at 5:54