Increase test coverage to approximately 80%.

[shaunluttin]

This issue involves choosing what test framework & runner to use and then using those tools to increase test coverage. We will probably use Mocha + Chai + Karma. Here are some testing packages:

• Karma
• Jasmine
• Mocha with Chai and Sinon.
• Jest
• QUnit

Annotated Resources

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26032124/karma-vs-testing-framework-jasmine-mocha-qunit

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9710297/jasmine-vs-mocha-javascript-testing-for-rails-3-1

• (Mocha + Chai) seems equivalent to Jasmine.

https://npmcompare.com/compare/jasmine,mocha,qunit

• Mocha is the most popular, Jasime follows it, QUnit is quite far behind in popularity.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23272521/difference-between-karma-and-mocha

• Karma appears to provide more features including spawning web browsers.

https://developer.telerik.com/featured/journey-client-side-testing-javascript/

• Testing Frameworks: Mocha, Jasmine, Chai. suite, describe, test, it let us group tests into suites.
• Assertion Library: Assert (comes with NodeJS), Chai, Expect, should.js...
• Test runner: These wrap test suites to be run in specific contexts (e.g. Web browser).
  • Roll our own (e.g. TestRunner.html that imports mocha.js and calls mocha.run())
  • Additionally, call TestRunner.html with Phantom.js
  • Instead of rolling our own, use Karma because it provides runner features.

[shaunluttin]

Closed by https://github.com/shaunluttin/aurelia-open-id-connect/pull/37 and https://github.com/shaunluttin/aurelia-open-id-connect/pull/36