Open firelizzard18 opened 7 years ago
Would you be willing to submit a PR for this fix? We'd love to have you as a contributor :)
On Jul 25, 2017 6:57 PM, "Ethan Reesor" notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm submitting a bug report
-
Library Version: master
JSPM Version JSPM 0.16.32
Current behavior: I have an app. One of the app's routes is first, which becomes #/first. first has routes, one of which is second, which becomes #/firstsecond. This fails with 'route not found'.
Expected/desired behavior: Instead of #/firstsecond, it should be #/first/second.
Fix: Line 173 of navigation-instruction https://github.com/aurelia/router/blob/master/src/navigation-instruction.js#L173 :
if (nonEmptyRoute) {- fragment = nonEmptyRoute.route;+ fragment =
/${nonEmptyRoute.route}
; }— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aurelia/router/issues/506, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIBnVGJ7pm7uQh4Xsckyj-WF3taT-r0ks5sRp0ggaJpZM4OjVV4 .
Gotta talk to my boss :/
I'm submitting a bug report
Library Version: master
JSPM Version JSPM 0.16.32
Current behavior: I have an app. One of the app's routes is
first
, which becomes#/first
.first
has routes, one of which issecond
, which becomes#/firstsecond
. This fails with 'route not found'.Expected/desired behavior: Instead of
#/firstsecond
, it should be#/first/second
.Fix: Line 173 of navigation-instruction: