Closed be-vol closed 5 years ago
good catch
so what would be the preferred behavior in case both elements are present? which one should we display?
I'm guessing <summary>
is better for a preview page? (and <content>
would be better for a full fledged reader)
Yes, I think that would be a good approach.
alright I'll do that thanks for the report
should be done in v2.4 on AMO
close the issue if resolved
thanks
I guess it is not solved. Tried v2.6 and on this page https://www.onliner.by/feed I still see 2 images. Downgrade to 2.2 solved the problem.
https://www.onliner.by/feed I still see 2 images
ok this is a different issue
in v2.5 I added the display of media:thumbnail images but some feed repeat the thumbnail image in the content/description of the entry
issue #12 talks about this, I suggest closing this one and continuing on this subject over there
if you downgrade manually you can use v2.4 which contains the fix for the original issue here but not the thumbnails
@alok1111 : you can use the latest version (v2.7) which has thumbnails disabled by default
I'm closing this issue since the original issue is fixed, discussion about thumbnails continues on #12
Hi, I appreciate the work on this extension but I noticed one difference to the origin display of Firefox. A feed I use very frequently (Jira activities feed) makes use of the
<summary>
and the<content>
element. But unfortunately the content of<summary>
is only a shortened version of<content>
. With the rsspreview extension I now see all the content twice. I guess its because of the used union select in the XSL template:<xsl:copy-of select="description | atom:summary | atom:content | rss1:description" />
In FF before version 64 I didn't had that problem. Maybe Firefox had implemented some logic like only use atom:content if atom:summary is not present or empty?