Closed moskalyk closed 6 months ago
Hi @moskalyk
This repository is not the best place for such requests. Please limit issues here to technical problems with Aurora Engine.
As for your question about SputnikVM, the Backend
is a trait which you can implement with any type you want. You should be able to accomplish your PoC without changes to SputnikVM. For example if you want both the Executor
and some other part of the application to have access to the same storage type (call it say CustomStorage
) then you could implement the Backend
trait for Arc<CustomStorage>
to share the same underlying storage with both the Executor
and anything else.
Hey there, I'm looking to get in contact with a either a specific dev from the ecosystem: https://github.com/mrLSD or someone who might have the knowledge to accomplish a specific goal with Sputnik or even maybe extend a version to support the function I’m looking for
They did some work on this it seems, and seems somewhat in the ecosystem, so I thought I'd try asking: https://github.com/aurora-is-near/sputnikvm
Or, if someone else has knowledge on how to do certain things like get state from the storage BTree of the executor... The backend variable seems private right now. My goal is to combine multiple VM states in a proof of concept that uses a parrelized just-in-time approach to execute call transactions, by stringifying the state and passing storage p2p
it’s funny, I think the most minimal architecture for this network would look like the near logo.
Thanks, morgan